← The silver notebook

/ SILVER NOTES

What moved silver from 29 dollars to 121 and back to the 60s.

The AI label cannot explain every turn in silver's 2026 price path. The Silver Institute's April 2026 account emphasised tight liquidity and investor interest, while the BIS's March 2026 review focused on leveraged investors, ETFs and margin spirals. [S6] [S17]

The dates behind the headline

The starting point belongs to 2025, not January 2026. Silver began 2025 below $29 and peaked at $84 in December, according to the April 2026 World Silver Survey and its release. The 2025 annual average was $40.03, up 42 percent. An annual average and a December peak describe different parts of that year's record. [S1] [S6]

On 26 January 2026, CNBC reported spot silver at about $109. On 29 January 2026, it reached a record above $121. On 30 January 2026, it fell about 30 percent, its worst day since 1980, with spot at $83.45 in the cited report. These are dated observations, not a price for the day this notebook entry is read. [S18] [S19] [S6]

The later path was lower again. A pv magazine report dated 25 August 2026 placed silver at about $57 in late June, $55.5 in mid July and $68.3 on 25 August. Yahoo Finance recorded $65.37 on 1 September 2026. The return to the 60s in the title refers to those August and September observations, not a permanent range or a current quotation. [S21] [S22]

What sources said drove the rise and fall

The Silver Institute's April 2026 account of 2025 identified the October squeeze, elevated lease rates, regional liquidity tightness and robust investor flows. These are the reported explanations for the earlier advance. They should not be replaced by an AI explanation merely because data centres also appeared in the industrial demand discussion. [S1] [S6]

CNBC's 30 January 2026 report linked the abrupt fall to Kevin Warsh's nomination as Federal Reserve chair, a dollar spike and profit taking. Its 2 February 2026 report then described CME margin increases stoking further selling. The sequence matters: the subsequent margin hikes should not be presented as if they alone initiated the 30 January move. [S19] [S20]

Those January and February 2026 reports identify financial and policy triggers. They do not establish that an overnight change in silver consumed by AI equipment caused the reversal. That narrower conclusion respects what the reports actually attribute, without denying the industrial uses documented elsewhere. [S19] [S20]

The BIS reading

The BIS Quarterly Review dated 16 March 2026 attributed the boom and bust to leveraged retail investors, exchange traded funds and margin spirals. Its account did not mention industrial demand or AI demand. That omission is a limit on using this particular analysis as evidence for an AI-driven price spike, rather than proof that industrial demand never matters. [S17]

The March 2026 BIS interpretation places trading behaviour and the financing of positions at the centre of the episode. It gives a different explanatory emphasis from a story about long-term equipment needs. The documented presence of silver in technology cannot, by itself, establish the cause of a particular day's buying or selling. [S17] [S1]

Flows beside the physical deficit

The April 2026 survey recorded 2025 inflows to exchange traded products of 278 million ounces, against a 2025 market deficit of 40.3 million ounces. Dividing those reported quantities gives about 6.9, or roughly seven times. The comparison shows the scale of investment flows beside the reported deficit; it does not assign either series a percentage of the price rise. [S1]

For the 2025 episode, that distinction prevents an annual shortage figure from doing more explanatory work than the evidence permits. The survey documents both a deficit and substantial investment flows. The March 2026 BIS review supplies a financial account of the boom and reversal. Neither establishes a numerical share of the rally caused by AI. [S1] [S17]

How the press used the AI label

The press examples reviewed as of 17 September 2026 suggest a more established AI trade framing for copper and occasional use for silver. Yahoo Finance's 13 May 2026 headline, reproduced on AOL, said “Silver is joining copper in the AI build-out trade”. That wording documents the framing; it does not quantify price causation. [S24]

CNBC's 11 May 2026 headline read “Parabolic AI rally has bulls eyeing a comeback for this one-time meme metal trade”. Only the headline was available in the research review, so no claim about the article's underlying analysis is made here. Both May 2026 examples postdate the January peak and fall. They establish that the label appeared, not that it explains those earlier moves. [S25] [S24]

Sources

Not endorsed by Robinhood Markets. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Pons.

Back to The Silver Shilling ↗